<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alpha Acquisition Process And Impact On Cost Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.galorath.com/wp/alpha-acquisition-process-and-impact-on-cost-analysis.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.galorath.com/wp/alpha-acquisition-process-and-impact-on-cost-analysis.php</link>
	<description>Estimation . Analysis . Planning . Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryn Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.galorath.com/wp/alpha-acquisition-process-and-impact-on-cost-analysis.php/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryn Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.galorath.com/wp/?p=1070#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Having supported the government through a couple rounds of Alpha Acquisition on major contract mods, my observation is that it increases the cost estimation workload, since each discussion yields another round of &quot;what would that cost&quot; questions.  Net result seems good in my opinion, with govt acq staff having a larger involvement in the process and therefore greater understanding of both the requirements and the proposed solution and associated risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having supported the government through a couple rounds of Alpha Acquisition on major contract mods, my observation is that it increases the cost estimation workload, since each discussion yields another round of &#8220;what would that cost&#8221; questions.  Net result seems good in my opinion, with govt acq staff having a larger involvement in the process and therefore greater understanding of both the requirements and the proposed solution and associated risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
