Just What the World Needs… Another “free” Browser… Costs Industry Big Bucks
I admit I used Firefox until Microsoft’s latest, tabbed browser. At that time the tabs made a lot of browsing easier. And I ran IE when things didn’t work right with Firefox. That was a long time ago. I now use IE exclusively. No significant reason to use another browser. But now we have Opera, Fire Fox, Internet Explorer, and the new Google browser. I suppose this is, in some ways analogous to having different java environments (something I try to avoid) or multiple versions or .net for different applications. Thankfully I believe the majority of businesses have standardized on Internet Explorer. But what is the cost of testing software on a myriad of browsers? And keeping up the latest versions of browsers. How many SAAS systems stop working because the browser the user is interacting with just got “better” This certainly adds the test time that another version of a local OS does (groan… I hate to see developers testing for windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista (home and professional) and on and on.
PS It is important to distinguish between browsers used as the infrastructure for business applications versus people web browsing. Hopefully organizations have some limitations on people “surfing” the web. And getting involved with unsavory sites. Perhaps those surfers need more consumer based surfing features.
Thank you for reading “Dan on Estimating”, if you would like more information about Galorath’s estimation models, please visit our contact page or call us at +1 310 414-3222.
Related posts:
- Open Source Software Is Not Free There is a great BLOG entry from someone who went back to Microsoft after a year at Google. Some of...
- Cost Estimating Throughout the World I am constantly struck that cost estimating (some call it cost estimation) is such a problem throughout the world. When...
- Happy 25th Mac Hard to believe the Macintosh was introduced 25 years ago, January 25, 1984 as this first Mac commercial points out....
- SEER Helps Avoid “Fact Free Planning” While at a conference last week someone discussed “fact free planning”. Â I had not heard the term before but was...
- APMP Cost Task Force Industry / Government Questions & Responses Here is the summary of the questions and responses from 2010 that were obtained regarding the APMP task force charter...
Comments
One Response to “Just What the World Needs… Another “free” Browser… Costs Industry Big Bucks”
Leave a Reply



The one advantage of multiple browsers is a lower profile target. Though that advantage disappears as more browsers increase the cost. It also is a question of who bears the cost. Typically the software industry absorbs testing costs, while users reap the benefit of a new browser. I’d tell home users to use the least popular browser first, since it’s likely to not be a smaller security target.